Here are a few stories I liked for today!:
“Humans are not the only species to prefer to use their right hand — chimpanzees also share the trait, according to a new study by Spanish scientists. The researchers reached their findings, published in the latest edition of the American Journal of Primatology, after observing 114 chimpanzees from two primate rescue centers, one in Spain and the other in Zambia.”
“The brain uses two different checks to guard against sloppy copy, a new study finds. By using a doctored word processor to sneak errors into typed words and surreptitiously fix typists’ real errors, researchers teased apart the various ways people catch their own mistakes. The study, published in the Oct. 29 Science, highlights the complexity of performance monitoring.”
“If you have seen the recent Hollywood blockbuster Inception, a movie that does to dreaming what The Matrix did for virtual reality, you may have been holding your breath as Ariadne, an architecture student, folded the streets of Paris over herself like a blanket. This stunning sequence, an homage to M. C. Escher, is testimony to the bizarre nature of dreams. Watching it made the neuroscientist in me reflect on what dreams are and how they relate to the brain.”
“Seven-year-old children only need to interact with a person once to learn who to trust and seek information from, according to a study by Queen’s University researchers.”
6 Comments
mkorp · October 31, 2010 at 5:12 pm
Dr. Freberg,
The article about seven year olds being affected by a single interaction was extremely interesting. It’s fascinating that by seven years old, a child can correctly remember and perceive a person to be trustworthy based on a single interaction. This seems to suggest that by the age of seven, children are well on their way to improving brain processes close to adults.
Laura Freberg · November 1, 2010 at 6:27 am
You can see the evolutionary beauty in this, but I was still surprised that they could demonstrate such judgment at such an early age.
Katy Lackey · November 1, 2010 at 2:16 pm
I found the article on dreams very interesting, especially when the author mentioned the potential to scan a person’s brain and then have the ability to determine what the dream is and the purpose behind it. The Author’s, Koch, statement about being able to explain dreams with an in depth brain scan perplexes me because dreams are so subjective. The detail and interactions in dreams are rather personal in my opinion, so being able to explain purely with bio-psychological explanations lacks credibility. Overall the article was insightful, yet I felt it was too dependent on the nature of humans and lacked support because of the failure to credit any environmental stimuli or personal experiences for reasons behind dreams.
stephanielow · November 1, 2010 at 7:48 pm
I thought that the article about how our fingers can detect our mistakes was incredibly interesting. If we could figure out how to make more use of our automatic error detectors, perhaps we would be able to make less mistakes. It would be interesting to see other studies of this nature, perhaps a similar study but with people that type slower.
johnson · November 1, 2010 at 11:11 pm
That’s a really interesting study the Queen’s University conducted. I wonder if the child’s ability to trust and seek information is connected with survival. Since children are more vulnerable I wonder if this is the brain’s method of self-preservation when a child wouldn’t physically be capable of protecting itself. The theory does fall short since the 4 year olds didn’t do as well as the 7 year olds, but I still wonder if that is somewhat connected.
Tweets that mention Laura’s Psychology Blog » readings in psychology for october 30th 2010 -- Topsy.com · October 30, 2010 at 1:02 pm
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Laura Freberg, Laura Freberg. Laura Freberg said: New blog post today: readings in psychology for october 30th 2010: Here are a few stories I liked for today!: like… http://bit.ly/bHPPDf […]
Comments are closed.